Community College Aid Administrators Discuss Year-Round Pell, Simplification on Capitol Hill

By Brittany Hackett, Communications Staff

Year-round Pell and FAFSA simplification efforts were the focus of NASFAA’s most recent Advocacy Pipeline event on Thursday, where members of the community college sector had the opportunity to advocate Congress on behalf of their students.

Ryan Delude & Joan ZandersDuring the event on Thursday, Community College of Vermont Assistant Director of Financial Aid Ryan Dulude and Northern Virginia Community College (NOVA) Director of Financial Aid Joan Zanders met with congressional staffers from four offices to discuss reinstating the year-round Pell Grant, implementation of Early FAFSA and prior-prior year (PPY), and future opportunities to simplify the FAFSA, providing feedback on these issues from the community college perspective.

“The community colleges are the economic engines in the towns and cities in which we have campuses,” Dulude said. “It was a really great opportunity to talk with congressional staff members about ways in which we can provide more economic benefits to the communities we serve.”

While discussing year-round Pell, Dulude and Zanders highlighted a letter NASFAA sent to the Hill last week urging House and Senate appropriators to restore the year-round Pell Grant in the final fiscal year (FY) 2017 budget deal.

“Year-round Pell provides an opportunity for our low-income, first-generation students to finish their degrees faster, with less debt, and to get into the workforce sooner,” Dulude said. "Pell Grant funds are investments in our future one student at a time, and if we can help those students finish quicker and with less debt, we’re benefitting everyone."

Zanders and Dulude also discussed future efforts to simplify the student loan process, including eliminating origination fees, codifying Early FAFSA and PPY, and reducing the number of student loan repayment options to two programs: one standard repayment program and one income-driven repayment program that would be the default option for borrowers.

The topic of risk sharing, or “skin in the game,” was also raised during meetings with the staff, where Zanders and Dulude emphasized the need for institutional accountability but cautioned against requiring institutions to pay back a portion of defaulted debt. Such a penalty would ultimately harm students, as the cost would likely be tacked onto the institution’s tuition and fees, Zander said. She said a better way to help reduce defaults and overborrowing would be to grant financial aid administrators the authority to limit loans for certain populations of students and to allow schools to require additional loan counseling when they see a need, both positions that NASFAA has strongly advocated to be included in the eventual reauthorization of the Higher Education Act.

For more pictures from the event, check out NASFAA's Advocacy Pipeline Facebook album. If you're interested in volunteering to be a part of NASFAA's Advocacy Pipeline, fill out an interest form here.


Publication Date: 11/4/2016

You must be logged in to comment on this page.

Comments Disclaimer: NASFAA welcomes and encourages readers to comment and engage in respectful conversation about the content posted here. We value thoughtful, polite, and concise comments that reflect a variety of views. Comments are not moderated by NASFAA but are reviewed periodically by staff. Users should not expect real-time responses from NASFAA. To learn more, please view NASFAA’s complete Comments Policy.
View Desktop Version