"In 1973, I applied to Yale on a lark. I started my college experience at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Years earlier, my father had made me a deal: He would pay for my college, but only if I attended a school in the UC system. But halfway through the first semester of my sophomore year at UCSC, I dropped out to work on Tom Bradley's mayoral campaign. After the victory, I expected to return to UCSC, though I did apply to transfer to Yale. When I was accepted, I had no idea how to pay for it," Blair Levin writes for Real Clear Education.
"Then I got an unusual offer. In exchange for a percentage of my income after graduation, Yale would front me the cost of tuition. And so I became a part of Yale's famed 'Income Share' experiment, derided by some as a failure, but — despite its flaws — quite beneficial to me. And, as it turns out, it's a concept that's regaining traction today.
In recent months, a growing cohort of colleges and universities — from big state schools like Purdue University to small private institutions like Lackawanna College — have adopted income share agreements (or ISAs) as an alternative to certain student loans. Proposals for a revamped Higher Education Act, likewise, call for 'risk-sharing' between institutions and students — an idea that, with good reason, enjoys support on both sides of the aisle.
As college costs continue to grow, and the student debt load approaches $1.5 trillion, higher education is beyond the reach of a growing number of students. Some reports suggest that as many as 25 percent of academically qualified low-income students apply to no college at all. My experience suggests that ISAs might help to address the deterrent effect of high tuition. They might also offer a more progressive approach to allocating the financial burden between students and institutions — and among recent graduates.
Like many aspiring students, I knew that a traditional loan was a financial burden difficult to discharge. And, like most, I had fears about my ability to compete and succeed at an elite institution. Although I generally understood that an Income Share Agreement would obligate me to payments, it mitigated both the immediacy and the permanence of debt. I knew I would have an obligation to make payments, but I also knew that I would have more choices to make in terms of employment. And so, the promise of Yale's ISA program helped to spark — or at least elevate — my higher education aspirations.
The ISA worked well for me after graduation as well. After completing law school, I was able to take lower-paying, public-interest positions. I was able to pursue work that I was passionate about without the burden of fixed principal and interest payments from a traditional loan. If my income dropped below a certain threshold, no payments would be required.
Ultimately, though, while the spirit of Yale's program was generous — and in some ways laid the groundwork for today's more thoughtful initiatives — the program's design proved unsustainable."
NASFAA's "Headlines" section highlights media coverage of financial aid to help members stay up to date with the latest news. Inclusion in Today's News does not imply endorsement of the material or guarantee the accuracy of information presented.
Publication Date: 5/16/2018