Borrowers From Lower-Income Areas Applied for Biden’s Student Loan Debt Relief Program at a Higher Rate Than Those From Wealthier Neighborhoods, a New Analysis Found

By Maria Carrasco, NASFAA Staff Reporter

Student loan borrowers from lower-income neighborhoods applied for President Joe Biden’s student loan debt relief program at a higher rate compared to those from wealthier neighborhoods, with most applicants coming from locations where the per-capita income is under $35,000, according to a new analysis from POLITICO.

The analysis examined the ZIP codes associated with the 23.6 million applications received by the Department of Education (ED) for the relief program between Oct. 14 and Nov. 11. The analysis matched application ZIP codes with U.S. Census Bureau estimates of per-capita income, college attendance and racial demographics, as well as the results of the 2022 midterm elections, according to POLITICO. 

A key finding from this analysis was that lower-income ZIP codes were overrepresented in student loan forgiveness applications. The analysis found that 98% of debt relief applications came from ZIP codes where the average income is under $75,000 and about two-thirds were from neighborhoods with an average income below $40,000. Less than 1% of the total applications came from the wealthiest ZIP codes where per-capita income is more than $100,000, according to POLITICO.

This information comes as many Republican lawmakers argue that wealthy borrowers will receive the majority of the benefits of Biden’s debt relief program. In November, Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.), chairwoman of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce, and Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), sent a letter to the Office of Management and Budget over the projected cost of the debt relief program. 

“Forcing the average taxpayer to foot at least a $2,500 bill for wealthy Americans’ degrees is unfair and does nothing to lower the cost of college tuition for working families,” the letter stated. “Taxpayers deserve to know if the Biden Administration took this into account when making its unilateral decisions.”

Another key finding was that applications for debt relief were more likely to come from Democratic states and congressional districts than from Republican ones, but not by that large of a margin. For instance, congressional districts won by Democrats averaged around 57,000 applications for the debt relief program, while districts won by Republicans averaged 50,000 applications.

There were about 15 million applications from ZIP codes that are majority-white neighborhoods, while about 8.6 million applications from majority non-white ZIP codes. However, POLITICO notes majority non-white neighborhoods accounted for more applications for Biden’s debt relief per capita than did majority-white ZIP codes. For instance, in Georgia, about 43% of the total population lives in ZIP codes that are majority non-white, but those areas accounted for about 54% of the student debt relief application. 

That can be due to the fact that Black borrowers on average carry about $40,000 in federal student loan debt, which is $10,000 more than white borrowers. Additionally, one in four Black borrowers would see their debt cleared entirely under the administration’s plan, which cancels up to $20,000 for Pell Grant recipients, who are more than twice as likely to be Black, according to the Associated Press. POLITICO notes that the NAACP, Congressional Black Caucus and other advocates of student debt relief have argued it will help narrow the nation’s racial wealth gap.


Publication Date: 2/23/2023

Armand R | 2/28/2023 12:28:44 PM

Thank you Darren C! Finally a voice of reason in a NASFAA article.

Our politicians and, by extension, the Dept. of Ed, waste so much time, money and effort on dividing people by color.

Yolanda T | 2/24/2023 10:40:16 AM

The article does not add any new information that most of us in higher education don't already know. It is an article to divide definitely without much substance.

Darren C | 2/23/2023 1:23:06 PM

For sure Tony, it's a no brainer. Just remember like most main stream outlets, Politico is looking to divide people. This article, like many others from both sides focus on division, in this case, using demographics, skin color and income. (low hanging fruit) There is no real, honest in-depth look at the overblown cost of education, the failures of Government run education, the ballooning debt that isn't being paid down, the forced mandates that wrecked the economy or the effect that forgiving billions will have on the tax payers and the country as a whole.

If people with more income apply for this debt relief and follow the rules, why shouldn't they be entitled to it? What about all the millions of families that have previously struggled to pay down school debt and get nothing from this? What about those in the future that will do the same? If certain demographics struggle with needing more debt for their education and have less success paying it back, why is that? When will those who created and control this system be held accountable? These are the types of questions that should and won't be addressed.

I highly recommend to everyone, stop reading articles like these. The problems that have arisen from these systems are not about the individuals forced to operate within them , it is about those on the outside that have created this mess in the first place. Start there.

Tony L | 2/23/2023 9:14:10 AM

Politico wasted their money...I could've told them that those in lower income neighborhoods would apply at a higher rate.

You must be logged in to comment on this page.

Comments Disclaimer: NASFAA welcomes and encourages readers to comment and engage in respectful conversation about the content posted here. We value thoughtful, polite, and concise comments that reflect a variety of views. Comments are not moderated by NASFAA but are reviewed periodically by staff. Users should not expect real-time responses from NASFAA. To learn more, please view NASFAA’s complete Comments Policy.
View Desktop Version