Report: Eliminating Subsidized Loans Would Cost Students Thousands

By Allie Arcese, Director of Communications

By Allie Bidwell, NASFAA Senior Reporter

Proposals to eliminate subsidized federal student loans could result in an increase of as much as nearly $13,500 in borrowing costs for students due to accrued interest, according to an analysis from the Institute for College Access and Success (TICAS).

There have been several proposals to eliminate subsidized loans in the Trump administration’s budget proposals and in the House Republicans’ fiscal year 2018 budget resolution, according to the report.

“Eliminating these loans leaves students who need to borrow with no option but to use unsubsidized loans, which begin accruing interest at the time they’re borrowed,” the report said. “While one single federal loan may be simpler, this kind of simplicity would come at the expense of college affordability and leave student loan borrowers with bigger bills for little to no gain because the savings generated from these proposals are not reinvested in students.”

Without subsidized loans, the report estimates, the average student would enter repayment with $3,900 more in debt due to accrued interest while in school. Assuming the borrower repaid the debt within 10 years, his or her total costs would increase by $5,100, and by $7,300 if repaid over 25 years.

That estimate doesn’t take into account if interest rates increase faster than current projections. According to the report, if the interest rate hits the 8.25% cap, a student would enter repayment with $5,700 in additional debt, and would pay 25% more over the life of the loan. If the debt is repaid over 10 years, the borrower would incur $8,350 more in costs, and $13,450 more if repaid over 25 years.

“As Congress considers ways to simplify student loans, it must take care to not increase the cost of college for borrowers currently benefiting from subsidized federal loans,” the report said. “In a time of growing public concern about rising student debt and broad consensus on the importance of higher education and postsecondary training to the US economy, we need to be doing more, not less, to keep college within reach for all students.”


Publication Date: 4/29/2019

Taylor T | 4/30/2019 12:17:30 PM

Did his take into consideration that students can pay on the interest while they are in school? The student loan issue that is not being talked about is the amount of interest the government is paying while students are in school. The government cant afford to keep paying the interest along with all the other social programs that have been implemented over the years. While they are a great concept to help, they are not feasible financially in the long term. At some point, there has to be a correction.

Mark B | 4/30/2019 12:1:16 PM

Do these numbers take in to account the elimination of origination fees and how much that saves students during the payback lifetime of the loan? I'm just curious to know. I know that the elimination of origination fees and subsequently not paying back money (and interest on money) that was never actually received may not offset, but it'd be interesting to see if the statistics above are as daunting as what is being portrayed in this article.

You must be logged in to comment on this page.

Comments Disclaimer: NASFAA welcomes and encourages readers to comment and engage in respectful conversation about the content posted here. We value thoughtful, polite, and concise comments that reflect a variety of views. Comments are not moderated by NASFAA but are reviewed periodically by staff. Users should not expect real-time responses from NASFAA. To learn more, please view NASFAA’s complete Comments Policy.
View Desktop Version