By Hugh T. Ferguson, NASFAA Senior Staff Reporter
The Department of Education (ED) is delaying a number of proposals that were under discussion in its most recent negotiated rulemaking sessions to the spring of 2023, meaning that the earliest the regulations could take effect will be after July 1, 2024.
According to regulatory updates with the Office of Management and Budget, the Notices of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) will be delayed until April of 2023 for the following rules:
The negotiated rulemaking committee reached consensus on the ATB rule, but did not reach consensus on the other four. While ED is free to draft language as it sees fit for topics that do not reach consensus, it typically does not make substantive changes to areas where the group was largely in agreement even if ultimate consensus was not reached.
For more details on the issue papers under consideration, check out our full negotiated rulemaking coverage or the recap summaries Catch Up Quick: Where Things Stand for Neg Reg’s Institutional and Programmatic Eligibility Committee and the Where Things Stand: Neg Reg Roundup - Affordability and Student Loans that provide a high-level analysis of the committee’s work.
As a reminder, final regulations that are published on or before Nov. 1, 2022 will go into effect July 1, 2023.
Publication Date: 6/23/2022
Federal Appeals Court Blocks ED’s New Borrower Defense Rules
Today's News for August 8, 2023
Biden’s Debt Relief Plan Heads to Negotiated Rulemaking Public Hearing
Today's News for July 19, 2023
Kvaal, Cordray Testify During House Education Subcommittee Hearing
Deep Dive: Department of Education’s Proposed Ability to Benefit Regulations
Deep Dive: ED’s Proposed Financial Value Transparency and Gainful Employment Regulations
NASFAA Submits Written Comments on ED’s Intent to Establish Negotiated Rulemaking
NASFAA Gives Comments on R2T4 and Third-Party Servicers at ED’s Public Hearings
Thousands of Public Comments Prompt ED to Remove Third-Party Servicer Guidance Effective Date
ED to Publish Proposed Rule on Income-Driven Repayment, Previews Gainful Employment Changes
ED Issues Final Rules on 90/10 Rule, Prison Education Programs, and Change in Ownership
Neg Reg Day 3: Negotiators Far From Consensus on Gainful Employment Regulations
Neg Reg Day 3: Committee Tackles Gainful Employment, Financial Responsibility
Second Bout of Neg Reg Sessions for Programmatic Eligibility Committee Get Underway
ED to Focus on Student Debt, Institutional Accountability in Coming Year, Cardona Says
Neg Reg Day 4: Institutional and Programmatic Eligibility Committee Wraps Up First Week of Work
Neg Reg Debrief: Committee Members Recount Experience in the Rulemaking Process
Where Things Stand: Neg Reg Roundup - Affordability and Student Loans
Neg Reg Day 5: Committee Looks for Clarity on Income-Driven Repayment Plans
Neg Reg Day 4: Borrower Defense, Predispute Arbitration Wrap Up While IDR Discussions Begin
Neg Reg Day 3 Agenda Tackles Borrower Defense to Repayment
Senate Democrats Offer Neg Reg Comments Urging ED to Continue Implementing Borrower Relief
PSLF Takes Center Stage as Neg Reg Enters Day 4 Agenda
ED Publishes Resource Page for Upcoming Neg Reg
ED to Publish Final Distance Education Regulations
NASFAA Submits Comments on Proposed Distance Education and Innovation Rules
Breaking Down Borrower Defense Regs: ED Introduces Another Borrower Defense Framework
ED Publishes Proposed Regulations on Accreditation for Public Comment
Neg Reg Committee Kicks Off Third Session With Distance Education
Neg Reg Subcommittee on Distance Education Grapples With ED’s Proposed Definitions
NASFAA Submits Comments on Upcoming Negotiations of Title IV Regulations
Peter G | 6/23/2022 12:28:23 PM
In a sense I'm not surprised. They clearly bit off a large mouthful with a very aggressive agenda, and the fact that even the NPRM for Prison Education Programs is not yet released was not a good sign for being able to hit a very ambitious target.
So from that pov I'm relieved they're not just jamming everything out the door whether or not they'll use the extra time to weigh and perhaps taper back.
It's also possible of course that they were looking at the scenario of Congress flipping in the fall and several of these, particularly GE, being wiped out by the Congressional Review Act.
Ben R | 6/23/2022 10:38:28 AM
Note: They're not delaying Borrower Defense to Repayment.
You must be logged in to comment on this page.