NASFAA Submits Comments on Cash Management

By Joan Berkes, Policy & Federal Relations Staff

On July 2 NASFAA submitted comments on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) published on May 18. As previously summarized, the NPRM focused largely on cash management issues. Two other provisions were included, one dealing with repeated coursework and the other with the clock/credit conversion rule. NASFAA supported the changes to both of those provisions.

Several of the cash management provisions generated a great deal of discussion and concern, especially those that affect the form of cash disbursements (checks versus electronic means), sponsored accounts or cards, fees that may be charged by banks that have arrangements with schools to facilitate disbursement of Title IV funds, and new disclosures, among others.

In addition, ED proposes to codify current guidance regarding prior year charges, and to broaden the requirement to make anticipated credit balances available for books and supplies by the seventh day of a payment period to all Title IV recipients with anticipated credit balances (currently applicable only to Pell Grant recipients).

NASFAA also signed on to comments submitted by the American Council on Education (ACE) and those submitted by the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO).


Publication Date: 7/7/2015

You must be logged in to comment on this page.

Comments Disclaimer: NASFAA welcomes and encourages readers to comment and engage in respectful conversation about the content posted here. We value thoughtful, polite, and concise comments that reflect a variety of views. Comments are not moderated by NASFAA but are reviewed periodically by staff. Users should not expect real-time responses from NASFAA. To learn more, please view NASFAA’s complete Comments Policy.

Related Content

Cash Management: Late Versus Retroactive Disbursement


Can We Round Clock Hours Up When Determining If the Student Completed the Payment Period?


View Desktop Version