Borrower Defense Web Center
Resources and Coverage
Overview
Borrower defense is a long-existing, but previously rarely-used, provision of law [Higher Education Act, Sec. 455(h)] that enables students who have been the victims of certain types of institutional misconduct to have their federal student loans forgiven. Following the collapse of Corinthian Colleges, borrower defense applications poured in to the Department of Education, exposing the limitations of the existing rules, including:
- Reliance on a standard tied to an act or omission of the institution that would give rise to a cause of action under applicable state law provided uneven relief, was confusing for borrowers, and was difficult to apply with the rise in distance education;
- Lack of a mechanism for seeking reimbursement from the offending institutions; and
- Lack of a specified process for application and review of borrower defense claims.
These limitations prompted the Department of Education to develop more detailed regulations, through the negotiated rulemaking process.
Final rules published on Nov. 1, 2016 were scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2017. In the interim, there was a change in presidential administrations and before the 2016 rules went into effect, the Trump administration announced that it would not implement the regulations on July 1, 2017 and would instead renegotiate the final regulations in late 2017, and early 2018.
While the renegotiation process was underway, there were several lawsuits filed against ED, claiming that its delay of the implementation of the 2016 rules was unlawful. Ultimately the plaintiffs prevailed and the 2016 rules went into effect in October 2018.
Final rules resulting from the 2017-18 renegotiation were officially released on September 23, 2019, with an effective date of July 1, 2020.
With another administration change in 2020 came a new interest in revisiting the Borrower Defense Rules. Negotiations were held in 2021 and final rules were published on November 1, 2022.
Related Content
Kvaal, Cordray Testify During House Education Subcommittee Hearing
Deep Dive: Department of Education's Proposed Financial Responsibility Regulations
Deep Dive: Department of Education’s Proposed Ability to Benefit Regulations
Deep Dive: ED’s Proposed Financial Value Transparency and Gainful Employment Regulations
NASFAA Gives Comments on R2T4 and Third-Party Servicers at ED’s Public Hearings
Today's News for April 13, 2023
Thousands of Public Comments Prompt ED to Remove Third-Party Servicer Guidance Effective Date
Today's News for April 12, 2023
Top Republicans Press ED on IDR Proposal and Urge for Extension of Comment Period
ED Publishes Request for Information for List of Low-Financial-Value Postsecondary Programs
NASFAA Analysis: ED Issues Draft Income-Driven Repayment Regulations
ED to Publish Proposed Rule on Income-Driven Repayment, Previews Gainful Employment Changes
ED Outlines Agenda for Its 2023 Regulatory Roadmap
2022 Borrower Defense Overview
2016 Borrower Defense Overview
2019 Borrower Defense Overview
ED Issues Final Rules on 90/10 Rule, Prison Education Programs, and Change in Ownership
ED Delays 5 Regulatory Rules to Spring 2023
Neg Reg Day 3: Negotiators Far From Consensus on Gainful Employment Regulations
Neg Reg Day 2: Committee Focuses on Gainful Employment and New Data from ED
Neg Reg Day 4: Committee Works Through Three Issue Papers as Session Begins to Wind Down
Off the Cuff - Episode 220 Transcript
Neg Reg Day 3: Committee Tackles Gainful Employment, Financial Responsibility
Second Bout of Neg Reg Sessions for Programmatic Eligibility Committee Get Underway
ED to Focus on Student Debt, Institutional Accountability in Coming Year, Cardona Says
Neg Reg Day 4: Institutional and Programmatic Eligibility Committee Wraps Up First Week of Work
Neg Reg Day 3: Negotiators Work Through Financial Responsibility, Change of Ownership Issue Papers
Neg Reg Debrief: Committee Members Recount Experience in the Rulemaking Process
Advertisement